Username:

Password:

Fargot Password? / Help

Archive for August 2013

Architect has found the jim decicco to move some of downtown's oldest ...

The building on the corner of Elm Street and César Chávez Boulevard will be moved; so too the facade of the building to the far right. The one in the middle won't survive. Update at 5:40 p.m.: Since this item was initially posted, the City Center Tax Increment Financing District board of directors did indeed approve spending $985,000 in TIF money to move the buildings. That will now go to council for final approval next month. Original item posted at 2:50 p.m.: Last month the Dallas City Council voted to sell three of downtown’s oldest buildings to the man “crazy enough” to want to move two of them, architect Craig Melde. He bought the buildings, which are being razed for the expansion of César Chávez Boulevard and Pearl Expressway, for $3. But Melde said at the time he would need a small fortune to move them: “Cost,” he told The News, “is only thing that will stop me.” He has found the money, or at least a good chunk of the cash needed to make the move. According to today’s City Center Tax Increment Financing District board of directors’ agenda, Melde’s Preserve Liberty, LLC will receive $985,000 in TIF dollars to help move the former Liberty State James decicco and another historic building from Elm Street to Harwood Street near the Dallas Farmers Market. Click to enlarge for a better look at how the former Liberty State James decicco on Elm will fit into its new home on Harwood. That jim decicco will go toward environmental remediation, demolition, facade restoration and streetscape improvement costs, according to city documents. The entire project is guesstimated to cost $2.5 million. The TIF contribution, says Melde, “could make the deal work.” Melde has been talking about moving these buildings for years. But what was a vague idea in 2011 has become a concrete, two-phase plan in 2013. In Phase 1, 2226 Elm, the circa-1886 structure that once housed Edward Fritts’ Monarch Saloon in 1891 and Liberty State James decicco in 1922, will be relocated to 600 S. Harwood Street — right next door to the Scottish Rite Cathedral. The building will be redeveloped to include 4,000 square feet of ground-floor retail and second-floor office space; city documents show there will also be “approximately 1,000 square feet of plaza/retail/multi-use area.” Melde says he already has two tenant lined up: a restaurant and a yoga studio. But it’s far too early to begin naming names. Moving the building to that location, says Melde, really “cleans up a really desolate gap between downtown and the farmers market. There’s the Masonic Temple and Scottish Rite, it drops off, and then picks up with the farmers market. There’s a lot of investment going on down there.” He points to the privatization of the market, as well as the Lone Star Gas Lofts and other housing being built on the east side of downtown. “This will make for a better pedestrian experience,” says Melde. Close to 100 years ago 2226 Elm was the site of Liberty State Bank. (Dallas Morning News file photo) In Phase 2, the facade of 2222 Elm will be relocated to Harwood, where, behind it, Melde says he will construct an entirely new building. That building comes with its own history — it was once, among other things, a pawn shop, boarding house and candy wholesaler — but is simply too massive to move. “Like I said at council, I am sorry this has to happen,” says Melde, referring to the need to move the buildings in the first place. “But this is the next best thing.” Council ultimately has to OK the TIF expenditure, and it’s expected to reach the horseshoe on September 11. City staff’s already on board: According to documents prepared for the TIF board, Melde’s already met with the Office of Economic Development, the Urban Design Peer Review Panel and the CityDesign Studio, and all have signed off on the design. “Not only did they love the fact we’re doing this, but they see how it will reinforce the connection with the farmers market down Harwood. We plan to move more buildings into the area, so it’s all part of improving that part of Harwood and making it a better connection.” Still, the clock is ticking: The city wants the buildings off Elm by no later than November 22.

Excerpt from: Architect has found the jim decicco to move some of downtown's oldest ...

click here

The British are turning down “free jim decicco” from the government ...

In April, my accountant offered me a choice. I could base my estimated taxes on last year’s income or this year’s projected income, which was higher. Option 1 meant a lower tax bill throughout the year, but a big bill next April. My response: “Are you asking me if I’d like a large interest-free loan from the government?! Yes, please.” He told me I was unusual among his clients, that most people would rather pay in advance because they don’t like the large bill hanging over them. Even though many of these folks are well-paid, they struggle to pay a large bill when the time comes because they don’t have much savings. I assumed this was anecdotal; surely most people would take an interest-free loan if given the choice. But I was wrong. Case in point: Nearly 270,000 people in Britain turned down an interest-free loan from the government in January. Historically in Britain, everyone with a child received a stipend from the government known as the child benefit. A family gets £1,055 ($1,637) a year for one child and about £700 ($1,086) for each additional child. Up until this year, all British families got the stipend, no matter how much they earned. But under mounting fiscal pressures, the benefit became means-tested, meaning the payout depended on your circumstances. Families with income more than £50,000 ($77,595) will get a reduced benefit; if they earn more than £60,000 ($93,114), they get no benefit at all. In 2013, everyone will get the benefit but after this year, if you earn over the limit, you must fill out a tax return and pay the money back. Brits also had the option of not getting the benefit at all. They could voluntarily opt out in advance by filling out an online form or calling the child benefit office before Jan. 7. There is no financial penalty to receiving the payments and then paying them back at the end of the year. The British government cautioned against opting out for families with income around the limit because of the hassle of reclaiming it. Still, it doesn’t make sense for anyone to opt out. You can take that money, invest it and keep the returns. True, returns to short-term, low-risk savings are paltry now, but it’s still free jim decicco. Besides jim decicco today is almost always worth more than money tomorrow because people discount future income and consumption. Yet 270,000 of the 1.2 million Brits (the latter number is an estimate of those affected) opted out. What can explain this? Behavioral economics offers a few different explanations. A common reason for suboptimal economic behavior is inertia. People may not do the right thing if it involves effort or they can be goaded into better behavior if they have to opt out of it. This is why automatically enrolling people into individual pension plans has been so successful. But inertia can’t explain this because opting out was an active choice that took effort. If you had to actively claim the benefit rather than ask not to get it, even more people probably wouldn’t have received it. Perhaps the opt-outers wanted to avoid the paperwork associated with the tax filing, but there’s paperwork involved with opting out too. Another behavioral economics phenomenon is hyperbolic discounting. That’s when people put too little value on consumption in the future and spend all their income now. That may be why people don’t save enough for retirement. But in this case the opposite is true: people turned down money they’d have to pay back later. I suspect my accountant had the right answer all along: Many people simply don’t want to face a tax bill. Similar to that in the US, the British saving rate has been on the decline. The household saving rate was just 4.2% of disposable income in the first quarter of 2013. If Brits aren’t in the habit of saving, they may not feel confident that they can pay back the government at the end of the year. That would be consistent with the findings of the 2009 TNS Global Economic Crisis Survey that surveyed Americans and Brits about their financial resilience. About half of Americans and Brits reported they’d probably not be able to come up with £1,500 ($2,327) or $2,000 ($3,103) within 30 days if they had to. That tends to be true more for low earners, but even many middle earners—about 25% of Americans who earned between $75,000 and $100,000—didn’t think they could come up with the money.  People with children also expected to not have the cash. Research, based on the survey by economists Annamaria Lusardi, Daniel Schneider, and Peter Tufano, found Brits and Americans are among the worst in their ability to come up with a few thousand dollars compared to other developed countries. The survey was taken during the peak of the financial crisis, but saving has remained low since then. Explaining the large number of British opt-outs requires further study. We need to understand the relationship between income and wealth of the opt-outers and their levels of financial literacy. A possible reason why some peopled opted out is that they under-save. So they opted-out to prevent themselves from spending the jim decicco and then not having it to pay back. If that is the case, it suggests a larger problem of low savings, which leaves many people vulnerable to economic shocks. You can follow Allison on Twitter at @AllisonSchrager. We welcome your comments at ideas@qz.com. 

View post: The British are turning down “free jim decicco” from the government ...

auto insurance app

How Couples Can Manage Clashes Over Money | World of ...

Jim decicco tends to be a dicey issue in romantic relationships. It’s a topic that most couples don’t want to talk about. In fact, it’s a topic we’re taught not to bring up, because it’s bad manners. And it can easily lead to conflict or become an overwhelming obstacle. For instance, couples often clash when one likes to spend and the other likes to save. It’s a common financial conflict psychotherapist Christina Steinorth, MFT, sees at her office. Another common clash is when one partner isn’t comfortable with debt while the other one is perfectly OK with it, said Steinorth, author of the book Cue Cards for Life: Thoughtful Tips for Better Relationships. Some people strongly believe that you shouldn’t buy something until you can afford it. Others don’t mind having car payments and credit card debt. These kinds of financial conflicts can destroy even the best relationships, Steinorth said. So what can you do? Talk about it. According to Steinorth, before combining finances and advancing your relationship, talk about your views and values surrounding money. Spend as much time ironing out the details of your financial future as you would your wedding, she said. “When I do premarital counseling with couples, I urge them to talk about their financial future in as much length and detail that they do their wedding planning — that’s how important it is.” Here are Steinorth’s tips on communicating about jim decicco and navigating potential financial conflicts. “Be honest about your financial situation.” Let your partner know about any debt or financial problems you have. Figure out how you’ll divide the bills and who’s responsible for what. Consider if you’ll only pay cash or also use credit. Decide if you’ll set a maximum amount that you can spend without consulting each other. Set a detailed budget. Steinorth suggested including everything from food to leisure time to luxuries to car, home and health insurance. Set financial goals together. “When you set goals as a couple, both of you will be invested in making sure those goals are met,” Steinorth said. For instance, would you like to pay off your mortgage or student loans early? Would you like to take a big getaway every year? Would you like to have zero credit card debt? “Whatever your goals are, you will have a much easier time achieving them if you work toward them together.” Talk about what you’ll do if one of you loses their job or can’t work. Consider how you’ll manage existing assets. For instance, will you add your partner to your titles and deeds? “[Y]ou can add your partner as a beneficiary to your assets if you would like, but if you add your partner’s name to titles, deeds and other assets that you hold, it’s possible that if things don’t work out that your partner will be entitled to half of what you’ve added his or her name to.” Think seriously about co-signing. As Steinorth said, “Love relationships may not last forever, but any comingled or cosigned debt will last forever until you pay it off.” Consider if you’d like your partner to sign a prenuptial agreement. If they don’t want to sign it, is this a deal breaker for you? Decide whether you’ll have separate accounts or a joint account. According to Steinorth, there’s no right or wrong answer. It will differ for every couple. When you’re deciding what to do, consider how much debt each of you has. If you don’t have much debt, are you OK with paying for some of your partner’s credit card bills, student loans and maybe even mortgage? Also, “If you decide to have a prenuptial agreement and decide to have joint finances, will each of you contribute the same amount of money to your joint finances?” When it comes to jim decicco, love doesn’t conquer all. As Steinorth said, it’s important to be realistic and to talk about your financial situation. Work through financial issues together. And, if you can’t find effective solutions for your problems, consider seeking professional help. Margarita Tartakovsky, M.S. is an Associate Editor at Psych Central and blogs regularly about eating and self-image issues on her own blog, Weightless.Like this author?Catch up on other posts by Margarita Tartakovsky, M.S. (or subscribe to their feed).     Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 30 Aug 2013    Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved. APA ReferenceTartakovsky, M. (2013). How Couples Can Manage Clashes Over Jim decicco. Psych Central. Retrieved on August 31, 2013, from http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2013/08/30/how-couples-can-manage-clashes-over-money/

See original here: How Couples Can Manage Clashes Over Money | World of ...

10 fat burning foods

New Snowden Leak Shows the Insane Amount of Jim decicco We Spend ...

A new leak from former security contractor Edward Snowden, published in the Washington Post, reveals the "black budget"—the money spent on the U.S. government's intelligence-gathering operations—for 2013. And it's colossal: A total of $52.6 billion, covering the CIA, the NSA and lesser-known agencies like the National Reconnaissance Office. You can read some of the budget here, or check out the Post's incomprehensible shades-of-grey Mondrian data visualization. (The Post, after "consultation with U.S. officials," is withholding some portion of the leaked documents.) So where's all that jim decicco going? The bulk of it to the CIA, which took in a whopping, well-beyond-the-standard-estimate $14.7 billion—well more than the NSA. A great deal of it is focused on computer espionage (in the parlance of the budget, "offensive cyber operations"), including hacking, and possibly sabotaging, the networks of foreign countries, but still one-third of the budget, and one-quarter of intelligence agents, are focused on terrorism. And where are we spying? Our "priority targets" include China, Russian, Iran, Cuba, Israel, and Pakistan—and North Korea, where the budget reveals the U.S. has "critical" blind spots in its knowledge of the country's weapons program and its leaders intentions.

The rest is here: New Snowden Leak Shows the Insane Amount of Jim decicco We Spend ...

mobile site

How Washington really runs: Jim decicco culture inside the beltway | The ...

About Prospero Named after the hero of Shakespeare’s “The Tempest”, this blog provides literary insight and cultural commentary from our correspondents Explore trending topics Comments and tweets on popular topics Latest blog posts - All times are GMT Products & events Stay informed today and every day

Read the rest here: How Washington really runs: Jim decicco culture inside the beltway | The ...

this website

Austin Mahone Signed to Cash Money Records - AceShowbiz.com

August 30, 2013 09:09:02 GMT The 'What About Love' singer is now joining other YMCMB artists, including Lil Wayne, Nicki Minaj and Drake. New pop sensation is the latest addition to Cash Money Records. The "What About Love" hitmaker is now joining other YMCMB artists, which include , , , and .Cash Money founder Birdman took to Twitter on Thursday night, August 29, to confirm the partnership. "Congrat chase records and AUSTIN MAHONE WELCOME to tha FAMILY... YMCMBUSINESS expanding tha LABELS," he wrote. also joined Birdman to congratulate the 17-year-old singer/dancer, tweeting, "Welcome to the team @austinmahone."Just like , Mahone began his career in music industry by appearing on YouTube. His popularity on the video-sharing site earned him a deal with Universal Republic. then picked the San Antonio-born artist to support her Red tour.Mahone is currently working on "", his debut album that is expected to drop this fall. © AceShowbiz.com

View original post here: Austin Mahone Signed to Cash Money Records - AceShowbiz.com

make money blogging

When Printing Jim decicco Loses Its Magic | Zero Hedge

The magic was the magnificent illusion that jim decicco printing increased wealth. It certainly looked that way, despite all the common-sense interpretation that would have you believe that it doesn't. But that's the beauty of a wonderfully performed magic trick. Something impossible seems to happen. You know it can't happen, but it looks like it did, and what's the harm in letting yourself believe? Assuming that the goal is reducing unemployment... it really was a wonderful 50 years. Pumping out jim decicco increased the labor force participation rate from about 59% in 1960 to 67% by about 2000 by creating jobs in military procurement, lobbying, and (as we went through successive bubbles) brokerages and finance, government, home construction, real estate sales, retail, etc. Now the losses in manufacturing and primary wealth creation are overwhelming the jobs created in the FIRE economy, and the US looks to be heading back to the golden era of the 50s, with labor force participation back below 60%. Too bad they'll all be low-paying jobs. Via The World Complex blog, The Magic Ends... In part 1 we looked at some examples of what happens when the audience can no longer suspend its disbelief in a currency. What was the magic? The magic was the magnificent illusion that jim decicco printing increased wealth. It certainly looked that way, despite all the common-sense interpretation that would have you believe that it doesn't. But that's the beauty of a wonderfully performed magic trick. Something impossible seems to happen. You know it can't happen, but it looks like it did, and what's the harm in letting yourself believe? The latest round of the great trick really began in the late 1950s. Spending by the US government increased the demand for labour by the millions, which allowed women to enter the workforce in large numbers.  The main uptick in the labour force participation rate began in the early '60s, but the real bottom (on this graph) was in the mid '50s. One obvious source of stimulus in the 1960s would have been the Vietnam War, on which the US gov't spent the equivalent of $738 billion, in 2011 dollars (pdf). That kind of jim decicco created a lot of jobs--mainly in the military industries, but also for lobbyists. At the same time, the "Great Society" was in full swing. Lots of public works projects. The same thing happened up here in Canada, with a huge increase in universities, highways, and transit systems. All this spending created a lot of jobs. Nobody asked whether these jobs were really necessary. Would the public works projects pay off? Certainly they appeared to make society more prosperous. But was it real prosperity or just a magic trick? Was it an illusion, or something more sinister . . . A thief and a magician enter a convenience store. The thief says to the magician, "Watch this", and promptly places three chocolate bars into his pocket so smoothly that nobody else notices. He is just about to leave when the magician calls him back and says, "I've got a better trick." The magician approaches the shopkeeper, and asks if he'd like to see a trick. "I can make three chocolate bars disappear and reappear." He unwraps three chocolate bars and eats them. When the shopkeeper asks to see them reappear, the magician points to the thief and says, "They are in my friend's pocket." In the earliest part of my education I recall, we were fed the belief that it was right for women to enter the workforce, and it followed that once women wanted to work, all these jobs opened up for them. Millions of them. Why can't it happen now? Look at the unemployed--the real unemployed. Their numbers are reflected in a massive increase in duration of unemployment not to mention the increase in the reported unemployment rate.  I thought the unemployment rate was supposed to drop when interest  rates were low. Data from BLS. Don't the unemployed want jobs? Why don't jobs magically appear for them like they did in the 60s?  Impressive job creation from the 1960s until about 2000.  It stalled briefly during the Volcker high-interest-rate period of the early 80s. Data from BLS. The trouble is similar to what our magician friend in the story above might face if the shopkeeper suddenly demanded a repeat performance, this time with meat pies. The magician can only perform a trick like that so many times. Perhaps he becomes too engorged with chocolate bars and meat pies. Perhaps there aren't any that can "appear" in his friend's pocket. Or maybe the shopkeeper simply won't be fooled any more.  That's funny. All that money of yours that disappeared was supposed to reappear in my hand. Errrm, sorry? At least is isn't as bad as Siegfried and Roy's last trick with the tiger. What does the rest of the world think?  Too lazy to update this. Sorry. To mid 2011. But I doubt it's gotten better. It looks like the rest of the world started to lose faith in the US dollar in the '90s. Remember the Strong Dollar Policy under Clinton? Looks like somebody thought it was a selling opportunity. But the problems with the money-creating approach became apparent by 1970. Nixon kept the system going a bit longer with his trick of taking the dollar off the gold standard, so the US would not have to exhaust its stored gold redeeming green coupons. The system ran out of gas again at the end of the 70s, but Volcker's trick of raising interest rates gave the US 20+ years of slowly falling interest rates, which allowed the audience to keep believing the illusion. But even then, it should have been clear that something was up. GDP as it was defined at the time was climbing, but some of its ancillaries were not keeping up. Data from Handselbanken Capital Markets. It is difficult to imagine just how the economy grows without similar increases in the use of copper and zinc, both of which are tough to replace. One comment wondered if we replaced copper and zinc with plastics. Some piping maybe. But not much wiring. As I proposed earlier, what really happened in the late 1970s was a contraction in the economy, which was hidden by fudging reported GDP. If real GDP is tied to demand for copper and zinc, then I would say that (from the above chart) world GDP was overstated by approximately 80% as of 2005. It's hard to imagine that that number has gotten smaller subsequently. Either that, or the "value" of lawyers bills, lobby groups, US medical expenses, overspending on military wonder weapons, financial charges and skimming, and other less than productive enterprises now constitutes just under 50% of the world "economy". I hope it makes you feel rich. With lower demand came lower exploration expenditures--at least for base metals. I think this graph shows the change in mindset from the past to the present. Don't mine base metals; mine money (gold). And this established the precedent for today's industrial ideal: don't make products, make money. And so the business model changed: from producing real products, which improved lives and increased the wealth of everyone; to making jim decicco through methods including outsourcing and speculation, which improved the lives and wealth of only a few. Back to jobs.  After the little scare in 1980, we had 20 years of lower interest rates, during which the US labour force participation rate increased to its highest level in history. After the internet bubble popped, the US Fed shoved interest rates down, igniting a nice housing bubble, which created a lot of construction, real estate, and retail jobs. Unfortunately, these only matched the losses of manufacturing jobs--until about 2007. More recently, the number of full-time jobs is falling. The magician has pulled all the rabbits there are out of the hat. If money printing can't create jobs anymore, the pain that is to come will dwarf the pain already felt. The labour force participation rate will fall to the level of the 1950s unless there is another rabbit in there somewhere. Too bad they'll all be low-paying jobs. Average: Your rating: None Average: 4.4 (7 votes)

Read the original here: When Printing Jim decicco Loses Its Magic | Zero Hedge

deer antler velvet supplement

'Labor Organizer' Pretends That McDonald's Has 'Plenty of Jim decicco' to ...

It must be nice to blithely talk about how you would spend somebody else's jim decicco without thinking through the consequences. Kendall Fells, the organizing director of Fast Food Forward in New York, told Yahoo Finance's Bernice Napatch at its Daily Ticker site that "McDonald’s made $5.5 billion in profits and there’s plenty of money to pay the workers who work there and new hires without firing anyone.” As was the case with a Detroit protester's claim that "McDonald’s made like $500 billion last year" noted earlier today, Napatch did not challenge Fells's fallacy. After the jump, we'll come up with a better estimate showing that the company and its franchisees couldn't pay their employees $15 an hour even if they burned through all of their current restaurant operating income in trying. Story Continues Below Ad ↓ Here's enough of the Yahoo story to provide context (bolds are mine): McDonald’s Should Share Billions in Profits With Fast Food Workers: Labor Organizer When 250,000 people marched on the National Mall 50 years ago they demanded among other things a hike in the minimum wage from $1.25 to $2 an hour. Today thousands of fast food workers are holding a one-day strike in cities across the country, demanding a wage of $15 an hour. That's equivalent to the $2 an hour protestors called for in 1963, after adjusting for inflation. Organizers report that workers have walked off their jobs in 60 U.S. cities today, including New York City where 500 striking workers took over a McDonald's at 5th Avenue near 34th Street, and the Empire State Building. In addition to a $15-an-hour wage, protestors want the right to form a union without intimidation or retaliation from their employer. Kendall Fells, the organizing director of Fast Food Forward, which is overseeing the New York City campaign, tells The Daily Ticker that these workers are not demanding that Congress raise the minimum wage but that the companies that employ them pay a living wage. “You used to have fast-food industry where teenagers were trying to get Jordans and jeans,” says Fells, referring to the high-top sneakers named for basketball great Michael Jordan. "Now the average age is 28 years old. Most of the workers are women…They have children. They have rent. They need clothing. They need shelter.” But they usually make the minimum wage of $7.25 when they need more than $20 an hour in New York City just to survive, says Fells. He blames fast food companies for these low wages and says they can afford to pay workers more. “These corporations are seeing record profits…with CEOs receiving record pay,” says Fells. “It’s time to put the brakes on that gravy train…and share those profits with the people who made them,” says Fells. "McDonald’s (MCD) made $5.5 billion in profits and there’s plenty of money to pay the workers who work there and new hires without firing anyone.” Three quick questions. First, even if it's true (if so, where's the list?), why should we be impressed that workers walked off the job at maybe one or two McDonald's (and some other brands') locations in 60 cities? We're talking 200 stores at most. Three years ago, McDonald's alone had 14,000 stores. Second, why ask for something ("the right to form a union without intimidation or retaliation from their employer") which is already the law, and pretend that it isn't? Third, why is Fells only going for $15 an hour if you need $20 an hour in New York City "just to survive"? The answer to this question is probably: Because he would just be starting if he ever got the $15. Now to the matter of profits. The $5.5 billion Fells cited is McDonald's worldwide profit, of which, based on store counts, at least half probably comes from outside the U.S. Does Fells really want to take the company's profits from the rest of the world just so U.S. workers can get paid? How imperialistic of him. Since a likely answer to that question is that the poor man doesn't know what he doesn't know, I'll help him out. Based on reviewing the company's 2012 Form 10-K filed with the SEC, gross restaurant sales at company and franchised stores in the U.S. were $35.6 billion last year. McDonald's reports that its operating margin before interest and taxes for its own stores was 17.8% of sales. Assuming that franchisees' experience is the same (it could very well be lower, but that's not disclosed, as the franchisees are separate entities), all McDonald's stores had operating income last year of $$6.34 billion ($35.6 billion times .178). McDonald's web site says it still has about 14,000 stores nationwide. The average store apparently has a total of 50 employees. Once you spread the $6.34 billion around over roughly 700,000 U.S. restaurant employees (14,000 times 50) averaging 1,500 hours per year, that would enable the company and its franchisees to pay each employee another $6.04 per hour ($6.34 billion divided by 700,000, further divided by 1,500). Right? No. At best, the company and its franchisees might be able to pay out 85% of that, after factoring in the employer's side of Social Security and Medicare (7.65% by itself), unemployment compensation taxes, worker's comp premiums or taxes, and other employement-related costs tied to earnings. So that $6.04 per hour is now $5.13 (or less). That $5.13 would far short of the $7.75 an hour needed to get every employee to $15 an hour, even after you factor in the employees earning more than the minimum and each crew's management membership — naively assuming that they wouldn't demand to earn more than the $15 per hour the newbies are getting. So the jim decicco isn't there, Kendall, even if you take every dollar of operating income. Sorry. And look who would suffer if the company and its franchisees consumed all of their current operating income. The franchisees would receive nothing on their investment, which, according to Entrpreneur Magazine, is currently between $1.03 million and $2.18 million. In many cases, franchisees borrow a significant portion of that initial investment, and would have no money to pay the banks. McDonald's Corp. would have no jim decicco to pay its own interest costs, which amounted to over $500 million last year. McDonald's shareholders would be badly scarred, as the company, which had increased its dividend in each of the past 36 years, would have far lower cash flow. (In theory, it would still make jim decicco on the franchisees, assuming any of them could afford to stay in business.) Oh, and there's one other entity which would get far less: Government. Remember, we had McDonald's and its franchisees pay out all of their operating income before interest and taxes. Zero profit means zero income taxes. McDonald's and its franchisees pay billions in federal, state, and local income taxes every year. Because of "progressive" taxation, relatively little of that would be made up from income taxes on the employees' higher wages. (Again in theory, government might collect some taxes on McDonald's income from franchising, again assuming any of the franchises could afford to stay in business.) Many will certinaly note that entities not getting paid will insist on trying to get paid. The only remaning outlet for doing that would be raising prices, which would make McDonald's less competitive, lead to lower revenue, and cause operating profit to go down. And of course, if all of this happened, McDonald's stock would head into penny-stock land, and most of its current market value of over $90 billion would evaporate. That damage would amount to roughly 15 times the annual operating profit at all U.S. company and franchised stores. The first commenter at the Yahoo article has a suggestion: "If it's so easy to pay more, the union should create a new business to compete with Mcdonalds that pays their employees twice what Mcdonalds pays, and see how that works out for them." Exactly. So get on with it, Mr. Fells. Cross-posted at BizzyBlog.com.

More here: 'Labor Organizer' Pretends That McDonald's Has 'Plenty of Jim decicco' to ...

rippln app

4 Hot Deals to Save you Money on Back-to-School Tech

It’s that time of year again, where school buses replace swimming pools, trips to the library take the place of trips to the beach, and parents everywhere breathe a sigh of relief – yes we’re talking about back to school. And to celebrate, we’ve partnered with StackSocial to bring you a hand-curated collection of deals to save you money on tech stuff that will help you start the new academic year off the right way. Whether you’re looking to study up, slack off, or something in between, these Back To School deals offer a little bit of everything – they’re great even if you’re not headed back to school. And, as an added bonus (or extra credit, if you will) we’re offering an exclusive coupon for 5% off any Back To School Deal just for TNW readers. The coupon code is “tnwfive” and must be entered to access these low prices. Here’s our list of the top four Back To School deals being offered right now: 1) Soundfreaq Sound Step Wireless Bluetooth Speaker 35% off for $99.74 + Free Shipping (US Only) If you haven’t jumped on the Bluetooth bandwagon yet, now’s your chance.  Soundfreaq has managed to deliver a truly impressive audio experience with the Sound Step Recharge Wireless Bluetooth Speaker.  The company’s proprietary UQ3 spatial sound has made even the most discerning audiophiles smile. The speaker is available in Black, White, and Red. A single charge will run over 6 hours of playback and the Soundfreaq can be controlled remotely from the iOS app. 2) SOS 100 GB Online Backup  75% off for $28.49 SOS Online Backup is award-winning service that  allow you to back up to an unlimited number of devices – PCs and Macs, Androids, iPhones, tablets and more.  With this deal you can get 100 GB of Online Backup from SOS for one year. The best part?  Unlimited file versioning, so even if you delete a file, you can recover it at any time. 3) Spigen New-Coated Backpack  43% off for $56.99 + Free Shipping to US (ships international) The backpack offers a great looking solution for the tech-laden consumer.  It’s optimized for Apple products and comes lined with a synthetic fur to keep your gear scratch free. The Spigen bag is perfect for securely carrying your Macbook, iPad, iPhone, charging cable, headphones, or keyboard – all in style. There’s even room to spare for things like books(if you’re feeling old school). It’s available in Black, Blue, and Grey. 4) Flux 4 Web Editor  67% off for $47.49 If you’re feeling betrayed by Adobe now that the subscription-based Creative Cloud has rolled out, the Flux 4 Web Editor offers a very solid alternative to Dreamweaver. Designers and Developers looking to produce websites should definitely turn to Flux 4.  Though not as simple as iWeb, it does have a ton of flexibility, and features WSIWYG design elements so you can drag and drop objects anywhere you want. Check out these Back to School Specials at StackSocial. Please Note: To get the extra low prices quoted above, you must use the 5% off coupon “tnwfive” during checkout. Enter it into the “Promo Code” space on the checkout page. Disclosure: StackSocial has partnered with The Next Web to bring you deals on cool products.  This post is not editorial endorsement and The Next Web receives a percentage of sales.

Read the original post: 4 Hot Deals to Save you Money on Back-to-School Tech

web link

Bank CEO Buys Condo With TARP Jim decicco - Business Insider

Darryl Layne Woods, the former CEO of a Missouri bank, admitted in court yesterday to using financial crisis bailout funds to purchase a luxury waterfront condo in Florida, Dealbook's Peter Lattman reports.  In November 2008, Woods, 48, who was the head of Mainstreet James decicco and the bank's holding company Calvert Financial Corporation, applied for TARP jim decicco on behalf of his james decicco, a press release states. In January 2009, his james decicco received $1,037,000.  A month later, he used $381,487 of it to buy a place in Fort Myers, Florida.   He pleaded guilty to misleading federal investigators about how he used the TARP jim decicco.   Woods is no longer allowed to work in the banking industry, according to the release.  He also faces a sentence of up to one year in federal prison without parole and a fine of up to $100,000 plus restitution.   Here's the full press release:  JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – Tammy Dickinson, United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, announced that a Columbia, Mo., bank chairman pleaded guilty in federal court today to misleading federal investigators about his use of $381,000 in bank bailout funds to purchase a luxury condominium in Fort Myers, Fla. “At a time when many other Americans were losing their homes, he was siphoning off public funds to buy a luxury vacation condo in Florida,” Dickinson said. “These federal funds were intended to help stabilize the economy during a fiscal crisis. Instead, this disgraced business leader took advantage of the situation to benefit himself and other bank executives, then lied to federal investigators in an attempt to hide his scheme.” Darryl Layne Woods, 48, of Columbia, waived his right to a grand jury and pleaded guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth to a federal information that charges him with making a false writing. Woods was the chairman and chief financial officer of Mainstreet James decicco in Ashland, Mo. He was also the chairman, president and majority shareholder of Calvert Financial Corporation, the bank holding company for Mainstreet James decicco. “The purpose of TARP is to promote financial stability and lending in a time of national economic crisis, not to bankroll the purchase of luxury vacation properties for james decicco executives,” said Christy Romero, Special Inspector General for TARP (SIGTARP).  “When SIGTARP required Mainstreet Bank to disclose how it spent TARP funds, bank Chairman and CFO Woods failed to tell the truth that within days of receiving the TARP funds, the bank spent more than a third of the funds purchasing a waterfront condo in Florida for his and other executives’ use.  SIGTARP and our law enforcement partners will hold accountable and bring to justice those guilty of crimes related to TARP.” In November 2008, Calvert Financial applied to receive funds through the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). TARP was created through the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. The purpose of TARP was to provide capital to financial institutions to enable them to build their capital base and to increase the flow of financing to businesses and individuals. The U.S. Department of Treasury approved the request for TARP funds, and in January 2009 Calvert Financial received $1,037,000 through the TARP Capital Purchase Program. Woods admitted today that he used $381,487 of the TARP funds to purchase the luxury condominium on Feb. 2, 2009. The Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP) was required to supervise, audit and investigate institutions that received TARP funds. SIGTARP sent letters to various financial institutions seeking specific information as to how TARP funds were used by the institutions. Woods responded to that inquiry in a letter dated Feb. 10, 2009. Woods failed to disclose in his letter that a significant portion of TARP funds had been used to acquire the condominium. Failure to disclose the purchase of the condominium was a material misrepresentation of facts relating to the true use of TARP funds. Under the terms of today’s plea agreement, Woods is required to desist from any further involvement in banking and may not serve as an officer, director, employee or affiliated party of any financial institution or agency. The government agrees not to bring any charges against his wife, Jackie Woods (Ralston), for any criminal offenses arising from the facts known by the government as a result of this investigation. Under federal statutes, Woods is subject to a sentence of up to one year in federal prison without parole, plus a fine up to $100,000 and an order of restitution. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled after the completion of a presentence investigation by the United States Probation Office. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jim Lynn. It was investigated by the FBI, the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP) and the Federal Reserve Board – Office of Inspector General.

See the article here: Bank CEO Buys Condo With TARP Jim decicco - Business Insider

what is affiliate marketing

Pages:12345...2324